Legislature(1995 - 1996)
07/19/1996 03:00 PM Senate MHS
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE TASK FORCE ON THE ALASKA MARINE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Ketchikan, Alaska July 19, 1996 3:00 p.m. TASK FORCE MEMBERS Senator Robin Taylor Senator Drue Pearce Senator John Torgerson ALSO IN ATTENDANCE Representative Bill Williams, Ketchikan Representative Gary Davis, Kenai Myrna Maynard, Staff to Senator Pearce, Anchorage Marveen Coggins, Staff to Representative Toohey, Anchorage WITNESS REGISTER Gary Hayden, System Director Alaska Marine Highway System Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 3132 Channel Drive Juneau, AK 99801-7898 Michael Downing, Marine Superintendent Alaska Marine Highway System Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 3132 Channel Drive Juneau, AK 99801-7898 Ms. Andrea Barkley P.O. Box 1037 Ward Cove, AK 99928 Captain Jan Sande 5237 Shoreline Drive Ketchikan, AK 99901 Ms. Stephanie Rainwater 926 Jackson Ketchikan, AK 99901 TAPE 1, SIDE A SENATOR ROBIN TAYLOR, chairing the meeting in the Ketchikan Legislative Information Office, called the first meeting of the Senate Task Force on the Alaska Marine Highway System to order at approximately 3:00 p.m. He stated Senator Torgerson would be participating in the meeting via teleconference from Kenai and Senator Pearce would be represented by Myrna Maynard via teleconference from Anchorage. It was noted written testimony was received for the record from Captain William Hopkins of Ketchikan; Wynn Hopkins of Ketchikan; and Sebastian Biagi of Ward Cove. SENATOR TAYLOR said it was his intent to begin the meeting with testimony from the administration to give them the opportunity to present an overview on how their mission statement is being met, as well as their plans for their immediate future, especially as concerns both internal operations and external operations, and better utilization of the fleet in the future. SENATOR TORGERSON expressed his interest in information on the scheduling of the Tustemena, as well the interchange of the ferry being built and how it will affect the communities in his area. He also expressed his interest in the task force holding a future meeting in Seward. [AT THIS POINT IN THE TAPING OF THE MEETING, GARY HAYDEN, SYSTEM DIRECTOR, ALASKA MARINE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, SPEAKING VIA TELECONFERENCE FROM FAIRBANKS, BEGAN HIS OVERVIEW. HOWEVER, DUE TO RECORDING DIFFICULTIES GARY HAYDEN'S ENTIRE OVERVIEW WAS INDISCERNIBLE AND NOT TRANSCRIBABLE] TAPE 2, SIDE A [DIFFERENT TAPING EQUIPMENT WAS STARTED AT APPROXIMATELY 50 MINUTES INTO THE MEETING WHEN THE RECORDING PROBLEM WAS DISCOVERED] GARY HAYEN related that in terms of the costs of operations in 1987, the system spent $64 million and brought in revenues of $33 million. The general fund support at that time was $31.2 million. Expenditures peaked in 1993 at $71.9 million with a revenue collection of $40.9 million and general fund support of $30 million. In 1997 the system is looking at expenditures of $67.6 million. He said if you took those dollars and used the producer priced index and deflated those dollars so that they're consistent, the '87 dollars would be $64 million and the '96 dollars would be $57 million, so the system is providing about the same weeks of service and they are collecting more revenue with less expenditures. SENATOR TORGERSON requested he be provided with a copy of the two- year scheduling plan Mr. Hayden had spoken to earlier, as well as the suggested scheduling plan for 1998. SENATOR TAYLOR commented it appears the two-year scheduling plan is for summer schedules only. He expressed his frustrations at the lack of consistent schedules for the ferries, as well as trying to get schedules for the fall and winter season a few months in advance. MR. HAYDEN explained the winter schedule is driven by a number of factors. That is when they do their refurbishment and overhaul program, overhaul and maintenance, and the lay-up of vessels, which is driven primarily by the budgetary constraints that the system has. He said if the system were not having to do refurbishments and regulatory compliance projects, and if they had a consistent funding, the system could lay out a multi-year winter schedule and they would be happy to run that. SENATOR TAYLOR said it appears that they are going to lay out a multi-year schedule for the summer months, which means they will sacrifice service during the winter months so they satisfy their commitments made years in advance for the summer. MR. HAYDEN explained he can lay out a summer schedule that is consistent because he knows that he has all of the vessels running during that time period. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if there wasn't a way they could schedule their maintenance so that they don't impact the entire fleet by having all major vessels going through major maintenance all in the same year. He said there ought be some planned maintenance on the fleet that literally runs years in advance. Not being able to get a schedule for the fall and winter months dramatically impacts ridership. MR. HAYDEN agreed, and he said he would delighted if he could provide a three-year schedule, however, funding decisions don't get made in that context of three years. He noted that in the 1991 master plan and fleet condition survey, there was a program laid out as to how much needed to be spent each year on the vessels, and there were schedules as to when that work was to be done over the next 20 years. However, the funding for those activities didn't follow the schedule. The ability to do multi- year scheduling in the winter time is driven primarily by the capital projects and also the funding as to when they can run the ships. SENATOR TAYLOR noted that the system got $3.5 million in funding from the Legislature in 1993; $8.5 million in 1994; and $19.2 million in 1995. MR. HAYDEN added that for the current year it is $10.1 million, however, for the next two years there is hardly anything in the federal road program. He said he his interested in running the Aurora next winter if they can bring the cost of that operation down so that it is more consistent with the revenue that is generated. On some of the runs the subsidy is 70 percent compared to 30 percent revenues, and if they can bring those two numbers closer together, they will be able to run that vessel on an annual basis and run it longer each year. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if their lack of advanced knowledge right now is because of the reauthorization of ISTEA. MR. HAYDEN responded that it is not. This year, for the fist time, the Department of Transportation & Public Facilities has laid out a 6- year CIP program (Capital Improvement Projects) that is basically competing against road projects. About a month ago he got that 6- year program, so he knows for the first time what his capital projects are going to be. SENATOR TORGERSON said there has to be some ongoing CIP and historical levels on spending so that they can predict what is going to happen and work schedules within that. MR. HADEN agreed, and noted he has scheduled out the major refurbishment program using federal funds over the next six years. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if any decisions have been made on the design of the new vessel as concerns the bar facility on that vessel. MR. HAYDEN responded that there is no bar facility on the new vessel. He acknowledged there was a bar facility in the original plan, but it was taken off at the time the decision was made to close the bars on the existing ships. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if there were public hearings on the issue and when the decision was made. MR. HAYDEN said he discussed the issue with the Southeast Conference on two occasions and it was mentioned at two or more legislative budget review meetings. The decision to close the bars was made about two months ago, which was after the regular session of the Legislature. SENATOR TAYLOR referred to a DOTPF report dated November 1995 entitled "Transportation Needs and Priorities in Alaska", that speaks to converting the bar area of the vessels to lounges which can be used for pizza and espresso service or conference areas. He said it sounds like somebody made an internal decision on this issue before November of 1995. He added that he doesn't know where or how that decision was made, but this was a significant decision as far as revenues to the fleet, as well as service to the public without any public input. MR. HAYDEN clarified that the decision was made by Commissioner Perkins at the end of the legislative session. During the legislative session they discussed impacts that would result at certain funding levels and the bar issue was one of those issues that was mentioned each time they discussed their budget. It was also discussed with the public who was interested in their budget and their ability to provide services. He said the system is faced with coming up with in the order of $1.9 million in cost reductions, and, unfortunately, $1.9 million in cost reductions is going to affect people and service in the system. The possibilities are fairly limited as to what they can do and what they cannot do. MYRNA MAYNARD, staff to Senator Pearce, said Senator Pearce wanted to know if there was any contemplation within the system of privatizing the bars and having someone else run them. In response, MR. HAYDEN said he was approached by Marriott Corporation some time ago, and they were interested in the food services on board the vessels. However, legally and under the terms of the system's current contract, they could not contract with Marriott unless they met same terms and conditions of the existing contract. Marriott said the contract was too constrictive and that they were not interested in pursuing their initiative any more. He added that he has not gone out and sought others because the terms of the contract says that if there are people working on shift they will be paid under the terms and conditions in the contracts the system currently has, whether they are state employees or private sector employees. MYRNA MAYNARD commented that food services often times break even, but she has never known bars to cost money, and it doesn't make sense that bar service was given up to save money. MR. HAYDEN said in order to save money on the vessel, you need to reduce personnel costs. The way to reduce personnel costs is to not provide a service. One of the services considered was the bar service because the bar service cost more than the revenue it was generating. He added that they are also looking at how they can reduce costs in the food service area. MS. MAYNARD asked if Mr. Hayden would provide Senator Pearce with the figures on the cost of running the bars as opposed to the revenues generated. MR. HAYDEN agreed to provide the information to the task force members, and he also pointed out that there is a legislative audit underway on food services, bars, etc., and he is looking forward to seeing what those numbers show. SENATOR TAYLOR said it his understanding that several years ago the accounting methods currently used, upon which he believes Mr. Hayden is relying for the numbers he is working with, were changed significantly to discourage private enterprise that might be interested in vying for the contracts. He said that as a cautionary note on any numbers that Mr. Hayden might send out, that if, in fact, they are not directly related to actual hours of operation and directly accounted on those hours of operation, then he does think they are very meaningful numbers. SENATOR TAYLOR also said he would also like to know what profit is being generated by the 156 full-time employees working in Juneau for the Alaska Marine Highway System. These employees are still drawing down a full wage when a lot of folks in his district have been in a vessel lay-up situation or on temporary status working summers for four or five years just so they can get on full time. He noted that since 1975, when the system had about 21 full-time employees, there has been shocking increase in administration, but there is still the same number of vessels and the same amount of crew people. SENATOR TAYLOR, in expressing concern with the added on costs to the system, noted that the Division of Risk Management increased the amount the Alaska Marine Highway pays out of its budget to cover claims brought against the system and any defense costs, etc. by $900,000. MR. HAYDEN advised that as it was they were paying over $3 million on risk management, and to have it increased by nearly a million dollars was a significant cost increase to the system. However, the Department of Administration has shown them how they are paying out more on claims than is being paid in. He said it was in their budget from day one and it was an issue and concern. In his closing comments, MR. HAYDEN said it is obvious there is disagreement on several points, but he welcomes the Legislature's assistance is advancing the system because both have the same goal: serving the public. He believes in the Marine Highway System and the service that it has provided over the years it has been in existence, and he believes it can be a viable means of transportation into the future. SENATOR TAYLOR noted the presence in Ketchikan of Mike Downing, Marine Superintendent of the Alaska Marine Highway System. Mr. Downing stated he had nothing to add to Mr. Hayden's comments at that time. ANDREA BARKLEY, testifying in Ketchikan, stated she tended bar on the Alaska Marine Highway System for 17 years, and the concept of removing the bar service is terrible in her mind because it provides such a tremendous passenger service. She noted the bar area is the only interior smoking area, and if the bars are eliminated, it will probably become a common seating area and smoking will be on the outer decks only. She believes it will significantly reduce the passenger services that are very important to thousands of people. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if Ms. Barkley has any knowledge relating to changes made in the accounting system used by the Alaska Marine Highway System. MS. BARKLEY replied that she has no personal knowledge, but in 1985 Tom Shanley, their port steward, called a meeting of chief stewards in Ketchikan. He expressed the administration's concern that private enterprise was looking into possibly vying for the contracts. As a protective measure, he decided to institute a profit and loss formula for the bars, dining rooms and gifts shops, and it was structured in such a way that the costs were excessive in the basic formula. Those areas were designed to show losses, except for in the summer months when revenues were really high. SENATOR TAYLOR commented that same formula is being used today to justify removing the bars. He then asked Ms. Barkley if she knows if there has been an increase in the number of employees on the vessels in the last 10 years. MS. BARLEY answered that overall she doesn't know, but she does know of at least 10 significant job losses. MYRNA MAYNARD asked if Ms. Barkley if she just worked as a bartender or if she also worked in the food concession area. MS. BARKLEY responded that she basically works the bar for her 12-hour shift. Occasionally she will work other areas if it's necessary, but that's rare. The bartender's work schedule was based on about a 65 percent workload according to the bar revenue figures. She spoke to the bartender on the LaConte and asked him approximately how many hours he tended bar on that vessel. He told her he actually spends about three to four hours of a 12-hour shift tending bar, so it is not even close to the 65 percent figure. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if employees fill out time sheets which breaks down where they are spending their time. MS. BARKLEY acknowledged that the bartenders all account for their time tending bar. In addition, relief personnel come in for several hours a day, and their bartending time will also be noted because they receive a higher rate of pay when they are tending bar. CAPTAIN JAN SANDE, testifying in Ketchikan, said the bar issue came about on the Aurora after a survey was made of Prince of Wales Island people about three years ago on services they needed or wanted changed. The bar issue was one of about 10 questions on that survey. At that particular time, the big complaint was the need for winter service, but the only thing that has been done for the people of Prince of Wales Island is to close the bar. CAPTAIN SANDE said when the Aurora went down to Tacoma for a major refit in 1994, he was told that the bar on the Aurora would be eliminated, so the concept to close the bars has been in the mill for a long time. He said the reason the people of Prince of Wales Island even put something down on the form about the bar closure was because of their concern about people getting drunk on the Aurora and then getting behind the wheel and driving to various points on the island. He pointed out that the bars are controlled, and they do not serve the people after a point. He has found that people who get off of the ship inebriated have usually been drinking in the solarium or some place else on the ship. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Mr. Downing that he be provided with a copy of the Prince of Wales Island survey, the results of the survey, as well as the cost of the survey. CAPTAIN SANDE also noted that since the bar has been closed on the Aurora, the cafe and bar revenues have dropped from approximately $6,000 a week to approximately $3,000. During their peak months of August and December those revenues would go up to approximately $8,000 a week. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Captain Sande his knowledge of the staffing levels on the vessels today relative to where it was 19 years ago. CAPTAIN SANDE responded it is his understanding that when the vessels are running there has been a slight decrease, primarily in the steward's department. SENATOR TAYLOR said he has been told that 19 years ago there were 150 more employees actually sailing on the vessels than there ARE today. He added there are less people that have to be administered to today, and yet the administrative cost that this system is currently carrying has gone up tremendously during that period of time. TAPE THREE, SIDE A SENATOR TORGERSON asked Captain Sande if he knows of any claims that have been filed against the Marine Highway System for serving intoxicated passengers and then letting them leave the ships. CAPTAIN SANDE replied that although he has no direct knowledge of any claims, he thinks there have been some. He added that when he was speaking with George Reifenstein about the bar closure on the Aurora in 1994, his reason for closing the bars was because of liability concerns, and he did mention some of these claims. SENATOR TORGERSON expressed his interest in finding out if the Marine Highway System has had to pay off some relatively high expenses associated to claims related to drinking on the ferries. SENATOR TAYLOR pointed out that the bartenders on the ferries have had extensive training on how to recognize when and if a person has had too much to drink, and part of that training was part of this concern about liability and risk management. He then asked Mr. Downing to contact the Division of Risk Management to get information concerning claims they've paid relative to intoxicated individuals coming off of the ferries. SENATOR TORGERSON questioned if there would still be the same liability if a passenger brought on his own alcohol and became inebriated and then walked off the ship. CAPTAIN SANDE acknowledged that he thought the liability would be same. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if pursuant to the current union contracts, if, in fact, these bars are eliminated, do those bartenders' jobs disappear. CAPTAIN SANDE answered that the bartender position on the Aurora went to a different position, although the pay was equal. SENATOR TAYLOR observed that as the bars are closed down and those bartender positions are moved to other areas of the vessels, it will probably result in nine more people, who hold temporary positions, being bumped off. MIKE DOWNING, Marine Superintendent, Alaska Marine Highway System, directed attention to the November 1995 draft of the needs list. He explained that the way the federal aid works is that for them to have a project in the current year they need to have started the process of obtaining the funding as long ago as three years. It begins with the needs lists, and what goes into that needs list is anything they consider might be needed in the future. He said that should help clarify why the bar closure funding was included in this needs list, because it was recognized at that time as a possibility. SENATOR TAYLOR asked if in order to get funds for scheduling refurbishment of the vessels, they actually get on to a three-year or five-year list with federal highways and then work their way up that list. And if that is the case, then why can't they schedule maintenance three or four years in advance. MR. DOWNING responded they know what they are doing this year, and they have the funding for next year fairly well identified. However, next year's funding is almost completely restricted to the new ocean class vessel, and he thinks the needs in the fleet are greater than that, and this creates some variability in the winter schedule in '97-'98. SENATOR TAYLOR inquired if there is a plan to remove all of the staterooms on the Malaspina and turn it into a day boat. MR. DOWNING acknowledged that one of the alternatives being considered under Juneau Access is to do just exactly that when the ocean class vessel comes on line. He added that if they think they might do that, they need to get it into the needs list. Initially, in the master plan, the ocean class vessel was seen as a replacement for the Malaspina. Consequently, the refurbishment program for the Malaspina has been less than it has been on the other vessels. It is still an efficient vessel, but it is in fairly poor condition and it was selected because of that condition. SENATOR TAYLOR said he has heard the rumor for years that the Malaspina would be sold when the new vessel comes on, although he has never been able to get the rumor confirmed by anybody. It is obvious to him now that an internal decision has been made within the Marine Highway System to continue to let the Malaspina run down hill until the new vessel comes on, and then it will have to be sold because it is in such bad shape and there is no use for it. SENATOR TAYLOR asked Mr. Downing to address the issue of most of next year's funding being restricted to the new vessel. MR. DOWNING explained the general fund maintenance will continue on in parallel to the Federal Aid Refurbishment Program. In the federal fiscal year 1997, the ocean class vessel is scheduled to use $52 million of the available $240 million. That causes objections from other areas of the state, but to mitigate that they have worked with the Federal Highway Administration to level it out and distribute the cost of the vessel over a three-year period, but they still end up with a peak in 1997 of $52 million. That is based on predictions of the cash flow that will be needed in order to keep up with the contractors progress. He added there is a spike in the program caused by that vessel, and this is the best negotiated agreement they could get internally for the use of funds in those years. It was further explained by MR. DOWNING that the first $4 million Mr. Hayden spoke to earlier is state funded CIP. The second $4 million is marine highway funds; it's either revenues or general fund monies. That goes to pay for the operations side, the salaries of the staff that is doing the work while the vessel is in the shipyard. So it is $4 million in operations money out of the budget every year. The federal program is separate from that. SENATOR TAYLOR then concluded that is basically $8 million of general fund money that they know they will have for the salaries, administrative costs, and capital improvements to be done each year during those two years when Mr. Hayden said there was nothing. MR. DOWNING said the 1991 condition survey said that in addition to the $8 million for maintenance, they needed to spend approximately $15 million in a federal aid refurbishment program. That condition survey predated a lot of the regulatory requirements they are now seeing. Most of the work currently being done is regulatory driven, such as fire safety, life safety, etc. SENATOR TAYLOR said it his understanding that when an escape chute, which was a Canadian product and not approved by the U.S. Coast Guard, was tested at Todd Shipyards several people were injured going down it. MR. DOWNING responded that it has been approved by the Coast Guard; however, that accident during the crew training at Todd is of great concern to him. There were some minor injuries and one very significant injury. These chutes address a Coast Guard requirement and a Safety of Life at Sea Treaty requirement to provide quick evacuation of the passengers. SENATOR TORGERSON asked if the 6-year CIP Mr. Hayden spoke to earlier is broken out into life safety expenditures versus major maintenance and so forth. MR. DOWNING replied that it isn't, but he can provide that information and any other information he may wish to have. SENATOR TORGERSON said this information is important to him because he is approaching this as a friend to the ferry system, and he wants to see it continue to operate and to continue to be able to have a constituency as far as getting the money that is needed to subsidize it. He needs to be brought up to date so that he can answer questions the people in his district have relating to the Marine Highway System. STEPHANIE RAINWATER, a Second Steward on the Alaska Marine Highway System, said she was on the Taku at the time the accidents with the chute happened. Prior to going down the chute there was no video presentation on the correct way to go down the chute, and only a brief explanation was given before everybody went down. This resulted in one chief purser breaking his ankle and tearing a tendon in his leg and four women spraining their ankles. She pointed out that it takes 4.5 seconds to go down the chute, and she can see where there could be problems, especially with the older passengers in coaxing them to go down the chute. She suggested there needs to be video presentations from each port explaining how to get down the chute in a safe manner. MS. RAINWATER related that she sailed as chief steward on the Aurora last week, and she keeps hearing about the bar area being changed over to a pizza and espresso machine area; however, the bar has been closed on the Aurora for two years and nothing has been done with that space except to make it a storage room for candy. Her suggestion on the chief steward's report this week was that they immediately take some merchandise off of the other vessels and change it into gift shop for more revenue. She said there is still the same amount of stewards onboard and this could be a possibility of bringing in more revenue. MS. RAINWATER also pointed out that the bars on the ferries have not be updated for several years, and she suggested that instead of doing away with them to update them by offering food service, install some jukeboxes so customers can select and pay for the music they want to hear, etc. She does not want to see the remaining bars on the ferries close on September 15 unless there is a plan in place to fill that space. SENATOR TORGERSON commented that it doesn't make any sense to close an area if it is just going to be used as a "broom closet" for two years. SENATOR TAYLOR added that if, in fact, it is a revenue generating function and service on the vessel, it is beyond his comprehension how somebody changed the plans of the new vessel that is costing $85 million plus to build so that there is no bar on it. He questioned how that space is now going to be utilized. SENATOR TAYLOR stated it was his intent to hold another meeting in August in Seward to give the administration the opportunity to provide answers to questions raised on the accounting system; what is going to be done with the personnel when the bars are closed; and how they justify a $3,000 a week loss in revenue on a vessel when the costs all remain the same. MS. RAINWATER noted she was told by Gary Hayden that there are 102 people working in the administration of the Alaska Marine System, and she has asked for information on how many of those individuals have had any experience within the fleet so that they are familiar with the needs of the fleet, as well as its concerns. SENATOR TAYLOR agreed that was a question that should also be addressed. SENATOR TAYLOR expressed his appreciation to the people who had taken time to testify before the task force and then adjourned the meeting at approximately 5:00 p.m. * Transcriber's Note: The on-line testimony from Kenai and Anchorage was extremely hard to decipher and, in many cases, indiscernible due to the input going into the recorder from those locations.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|